A Ping Rule Idea

I'm not saying you can't I'm just asking if your having fun, because I am loving the side comments I have been recovering from friends. Also you should have said that in the first place. You know equal means the equivalent of not the measurement of so you should have said measurement in the first place.
Your the one not dropping it I tried dropping it an hour or so ago. But nope you want to keep arguing it. I also like how you never make a new point once you just repeats yourself this whole entire time and failed to even comprehend my simple request of a resolve. Also what makes you think me using your words against you have no claim. If you don't use the right words you make holes and thus make it easier for me.to just use your words against you then expresse my whole claim. Also why the fuck have you not just stopped replying if your done?
Oh and what happened to your political bull crap saying I was being "discriminating" by asking for a change wass it because I said you sounded communistic??

I am a communist though so I can see how I sound communistic :p. My name is IronCurtain for chist's sake

Well then Mr. Communists your ideals are faulty, they failed before many times in history, what makes you think they will work now?


The people try to be equal but nature and technological availability are making that impossible.

This is so untopical and unrelated to the original conversation, but I like political conversations .

"ideas are faulty" - Ideas can never be faulty...

"They have failed before many times in history" - When? If you think Stalin or Mao (the only two major 'communists' in history) were actually communist and followed communist ideals then you're mistaken. Communism (primarily anarcho-communism) doesn't have a government, doesn't have capitalism, nor does it have any form of currency or property. All of those things still existed inside of Mao and Stalins government and thus 'communism' has never truly been tried. I don't describe myself as a communist because I disagree with labeling, but I agree with major communist ideals. Communism in itself is the idea of communal living in which all people have access to basic human rights (food, water, education) and then are able to expand in technological, philosophical + spiritual, and overall productive fields.

Basic ideas of communism are working right now, public education, public roads, public transportation, the military, FBI, EPA, socialized medicine, all of those things and many more are idea stemmed very closely to what the tenents of what communism and marxism is in a whole.

You say people try to be equal and "nature and technology" make that impossible, however I completely disagree. Nature supports humanity and supports equality. We are in a natural shift towards more and more equality, not too long ago if you were black you could be killed in the streets, now that doesn't happen to often deos it? Technology in itself provides more people with their basic needs and thus leads to more equality. Look at first world countries, are we not living better than third world countries that can't provide food? We have technology to thank for that equality and quality of life.

Communsim, marxism, socialism, anarchism and everything around those words has such a sour taste in the United States. Why?.. Simple, how many people have actually read into the philosophies and tenents of any of those philosophies? We were born and raised opposing communism because we believed the Soviet union was communist, because the Koreans and Vietnamese were communists. Ever since the cold war we needed a label to hate and communism fit that bill. Now we are shifting away from that, communism isn't such a sour word. Now "muslim" and "islam" is because people are also misconceiving that. nations and the media NEED the people to subscribe to their narratives, and narratives are easier to sell when you can blame a figure head, label, or anything unhuman. However at the end of the day, we are all human, and as someone who carries communist ideals, I think we need to embrace that humanity rather than the differences that push us to the side.

this is why I think politics are boring, why you thought it was necessary to write a short essay is above me. why you went off topic is also makes no sense.


Now Sexy if your still here hopefully you understood the new suggestion I had made mention to multiple time.

I like politics xD. Also once again you made statements that I had to refute. Like Katy said and most likely what Sexy would agree with, this rule is out of question. For better connectivity, I think Sexy tries his best to ensure connectivity

three things.
1. you don't have to refute anything
2. Have I asked about the rule since I stopped writing mini novels.
3. When did I ever talk about ensuring connectivity if you think that's what I am saying, them maybe you need to re-read what I have said and actually comprehend it.

You're disrespect is so offputting. You can argue without it

I haven't been really disrespecting, but if that's what you want to call it go ahead. Now if you excuse me I'm going to see if Sexy figured out what I meant since I no longer really need to talk to you. thanks for keeping me from sleeping and have a good night.

Wow, after ready all of this it makes me frown. All this topic has shown me is the immaturity of both of you. You guys really are getting this heated over nothing. This really shows me some things about both of you.

I don't think either of us were really heated, it was an interesting debate :p. You should know from the Jerry incident that I'll debate all things

I understand how debates go. But the fact that you guys just sat he arguing with each other over one of the dumbest things ever. And I could tell by the dialect of spirit that she was getting mad and I'm going to assume that she doesn't really like you because of all of this. So if I have a problem with you two, I will not hesitate to take care of it.

Sounds fair :p. You know I argue over dumb things and address all points equally dumb or not. However in the future if you want I can debate less especially if it,c$ over lesser things

+1 support